A 'Lite' Controversy
Many of you will have noticed by now that Mental Case 2.0 for iPhone has hit the App Store shelves. The new release — or should I say, ‘releases’ — are the result of a significant development effort, and are a major improvement over version 1.0.
Despite this, we have received a few very angry emails, and forum posts, accusing us of ‘slimy’ and dubious business practices. I’ll be perfectly honest — I didn’t see this coming at all. It never occurred to me that someone would be insulted by our upgrade path, but they clearly are. I’m not sure if this is a widespread concern, or just a concern for the few that bother to email, but to hopefully clear the water, let me explain our reasoning.
First, I should clarify the issue: When you upgrade from ‘Mental Case 1.0 for iPhone’ you end up with ‘Mental Case Lite 2.0 for iPhone’. The addition of the word ‘Lite’ to the name is what has some people ‘up in arms’; they are of the belief that we have ‘downgraded’ our loyal customers.
Let me reassure everyone that this is not the case. ‘Mental Case Lite 2.0’ is a much better product that ‘Mental Case 1.0’. It can do everything the original version can do, and a bit more. For example, you can now set the size and font for slideshows, and use correction (right/wrong) in slideshows, a much requested feature. You can double tap images to zoom and scroll them, and navigate slideshows in true full-screen mode. You can also browse flashcardexchange.com (though not download from it). In short, there is lots to be happy about with this free upgrade.
So why did we call the product ‘Mental Case Lite’? To distinguish it from the new, even more advanced, paid edition. Some have asked why we didn’t avoid this by keeping the original as ‘Mental Case’, and naming the new edition ‘Mental Case Pro’. This would certainly have gone down better with our existing customers, but it has one serious flaw: a new user that downloads the ‘lite’ version may not realize that they can upgrade, because there is nothing to indicate that it is a less feature-full edition. This would be bad for sales, which would ultimately also be bad for our customers, because we could not warrant spending the same resources developing the app.
To be clear, the paid version of Mental Case 2.0 for iPhone has some significant advantages over the free version. You can add and edit notes and cases on the iPhone, for one. These can be synced back to your Mac over a wireless network. The full edition also allows you to download directly from Flashcard Exchange, the largest online repository of flashcards in the World. We did an exclusive deal with Flashcard Exchange to be able to integrate their content, free to everyone that buys the paid edition of Mental Case 2.0. If you do the math, you get a great deal: Flashcard Exchange normally charges $20 for an account that allows you to download; with Mental Case 2.0, you pay $7.99, and can download as much as you like from a free Flashcard Exchange account, and sync the downloaded cards back to your Mac. What’s not to like?
The last issue I would like to address is why we didn’t just let all existing users upgrade for free to the full version of Mental Case 2.0. After all, we make income from sales of the desktop product, so aren’t we just being greedy asking people to pay for the iPhone app?
Part of the answer lies in the previous paragraph: we have a deal with Flashcard Exchange, and it would not be right to give away their content, and the server traffic that involves, and not give anything to them in return.
The second part of the answer is that you no longer need to buy the desktop version of Mental Case to use Mental Case for iPhone. For example, a Windows user could buy the iPhone app, create some cards on Flashcard Exchange, and download them to the phone — no Mac involved. If we gave away the iPhone version, these users could use Mental Case completely free; nice for the user, but less nice for our bottom line, which ultimately would hurt our customers too.
We hope that most users look a bit deeper than just the name of an app. We hope that you like Mental Case based on its functionality and interface design, whether you think it has a good name or not. “What’s in a name?” Not much in my book.
- drewmccormack's blog
- Login or register to post comments




Sounds good to me
I'm sure it was just simply a misunderstanding. For myself I've always been very satisfied with your (Drew McCormack) business practices, a high level of transparency, integrity and fairness have always been shown. The new app structure also makes a lot of sense. Keep up the good work.
There are always unhappy
There are always unhappy people. I always find it a bit odd that lot's of commentors on the app store never go and read the websites for the apps - I usually find the answers I want by reading the blogs.
I for one am really pleased with the new updates. I entirely understand why you want to charge - apps aren't free to develop and if it is your business you need to make money somehow! They are good value for money for what you get.
To me there is no real
To me there is no real difference between the 1.0 version and the 2.0 version. From what I figure its individuals who are confused about the naming structure.
I don't care either way but from my perspective a lite version represents a version that is missing features from the regular version and is somehow crippled. But using a PRO version means you get not only the normal feature complete app but a few additional features.
This is the way they structured instapaper (which is great use in the bathroom... no more stacks of magazines) and it would make more sense to me if it were marketed that way. But I don't really care one way or another since I know the difference between the two apps and I'm fine with it.
Keep up the good work, can't wait til the next version of mental case comes out
Oh and I wish you would go back to the old icon on the iPhone version :-P much cooler...
OK back to using mental case for my micro exam tomorrow. (I've had it open for more than 36 hours straight studying)
You can't make everyone happy
I think that even if you had given away the pro version freely, it wouldn't have made some people happy. Overall I am very happy with your decision and thinks its entirely fair.
I am slightly more concerned about the development speed of the desktop app which seems very slow at the moment. I hope that the iphone app does well and you have resources to speed up the development of the desktop app. There are a lot of features pending and I only hope you will add them soon.
Best of luck.
Re: Desktop version
With the iPhone version now pretty stable, other than bug fixes, we will turn our attention fully to the desktop version. We hope to release a major, free 1.5 upgrade in a few months, which will hopefully address some of the most pressing shortcomings.
Drew
---------------------------
Drew McCormack
Mental Case Developer
To me/others:Lite = stuff stripped out, Pro = extra stuff added.
-----
"but it has one serious flaw: a new user that downloads the ‘lite’ version may not realize that they can upgrade, because there is nothing to indicate that it is a less feature-full edition."
-----
Of course the way you have done it (playing devil's advocate) also has a "perhaps" serious flaw. A potential new user sees Mental Case (a flash card application) for $7.99 and thinks that's too much never to realize that there is a free (Lite) version available they can check out. Also, never to realize that you produce a fine Mac version of the application as well.
Personally, I think you were more likely to get people to "download" and "checkout" the free version (named Mental Case) where you could then perhaps mention in the app about the "Pro" version with advanced features (when they went to setup their flashcardexchange id info, "with the Pro version you can download flashcards, etc.") than to get people to "see" the Lite version after only seeing the $7.99 regular version in the Appstore.
Also, I believe you could have done "A LOT" with the free version download screen on the Appstore to accentuate the Pro version. I'm guessing most users checkout the Apps download page vs. just clicking on the Get App button.
Also, I think Lite accentuates the negative where Pro accentuates the positive.
Regards,
- Mark
RE: Lite vs Pro
Hi Mark,
I guess we'll probably have to agree to disagree on this issue. Here are a few things that I think favor a 'lite' version:
1) Users may use a 'stripped down' version for a few weeks before deciding whether to buy the full-featured edition. If an app has 'lite' in the name, you can't forget that you can upgrade, but I bet a lot of people would forget if the lite version was called 'Mental Case'.
2) I can't name any other apps in the app store using the 'Pro' approach. In fact, there are very few on Mac apps that do. QuickTime is about the only one I can think of. (You could also point to 'Final Cut Pro', but Apple play it both ways, and have called the 'lite' version 'Final Cut Express'.) The use of 'lite' seems to becoming a de facto standard on the app store, and users know what it means.
3) Because the lite version is free, it is downloaded much more, and stands a bit higher in the rankings than the paid edition. That means the 'lite' version is more likely to be found, and having 'lite' in the name immediately indicates there is another version. People are less likely to come across the Pro version first, so the risk they may not figure out there is a lite version is a bit less.
In any case, I don't think this is nearly as serious a point as some people are making out. The apps have exactly the same functionality, whether they are 'Mental Case Lite' and 'Mental Case', or 'Mental Case' and 'Mental Case Pro'. One is less-feature-full, or crippled, or whatever you want to call it, and the other has all features. The naming is just a question of marketing.
Drew
---------------------------
Drew McCormack
Mental Case Developer
Lite, Regular, Pro
Hi Drew,
I guess the main thing that caused this "issue" was the fact that there was already the "Mental Case 1.0" version out there. Had this been the initial release I'm sure none of this would have been an issue.
Perhaps something along the lines of Final Cut might have been better and avoided some confusion. Naming the apps "Mental Case Lite" and "Mental Case Pro". That would have probably been easier for 1.0 users to see the difference (Mental Case 1.0 = Mental Case Lite 2.0, which actually has new stuff) and further differentiated the two apps.
There are quite a few "Pro" apps in the Appstore. Just do a search in iTunes and then click on the "Applications" box that appears.
Also, let me ask you something. A big company like Apple, with lots of money to do marketing research, names the "Lite" version of their application "Express". Why do you think that is the case? Adobe, another large company names the "Lite" version of their program "Elements". You walk into a software store and you see two boxes on the shelf, one says Photoshop Lite and the other says Photoshop Elements. Both have the same price. In your mind which is more appealing?
With regards to people seeing the Lite/Free version more. Unless your application is in the top 100 free apps, top 20 Education apps, or on the first 2 screens of the "Most Popular" Education apps, I'm not sure it would matter much.
I really think Apple needs to have 4 columns in the main "Appstore". 1 column for the Top 20 Free apps, 1 column for the Top 20 dollar apps, 1 column for the Top 20 $5 and under apps, and 1 column for Top 20 $5 to $10 apps. Perhaps a row at the bottom with Popular apps costing more than $10. I think the current method is driving developers to lower the price of their apps to keep them in the top 100. Which is good for the consumer but not so good for the developers. It's currently too much like the Music side of things where there isn't a whole lot of difference from one song to another's "development" wise. At least I wouldn't think there is.
Regards,
- Mark
Re: Lite
Hi Mark,
I don't think there is any way we could have avoided the 'issue', other than calling the lite version 'Mental Case', and -- as I said in my previous email -- this has some downsides.
Even going with 'Mental Case Lite' and 'Mental Case Pro', some people would have been angry that they ended up with the Lite version. A few users -- luckily very few -- seem to think that because they downloaded a free version 1.0 app, they are in some way entitled to free updates for life, and that they should receive the paid edition. These people probably would have complained whatever the app was called.
I do find it funny that people have such an aversion to the word 'Lite'. I personally don't have that. Other things we could have called it, like 'Mental Case Express', would never work with a small product like ours: It's fine for Apple and Adobe, but people would just assume 'Mental Case Express' was a model train app or something like that.
Kind regards,
Drew
---------------------------
Drew McCormack
Mental Case Developer
Model train app.
A model train app, hey that sounds cool. What are you waiting for. :)
I'd buy it.
I agree that some people would have complained no matter what if they didn't get the paid app for free.
I think the aversion to Lite probably varies from person to person for various reasons. My father-in-law did not care for "fat free" or Lite food products as to him they had less flavor, etc.
As for the paid version, is there any limitation to the number of flash card packs that I can download from the exchange? Is there any requirement to pay a renewal fee?
Take care,
- Mark
Re: Downloads
No, there is no limit to how much you can download. If you download too much onto your phone, you may run into memory issues, but you can sync downloaded cards back to your Mac, and then keep downloading. You just need to limit the number of cards on your phone at any one time. (Usually it will handle a few thousand, but probably not much more than that.)
There is no renewal fee, but -- of course -- future upgrades to the app may require payment. We have no paid upgrades planned at this stage though.
Drew
---------------------------
Drew McCormack
Mental Case Developer
FlashCardExchange Renewal?
The renewal fee I was thinking of was more related to the FlashCardExchange system. Is there any chance that 6 months down the road they'll require a renewal fee to still access their site even though we've bought the full version of Mental Case?
- Mark
Re: Flashcard Exchange Renewal?
Hi Mark,
Of course, I can't make any promises, because I don't know what the future will bring, but what I can say is that it is not our intention that you will have to renew on flashcard exchange. To begin with, you can use a free account, and flashcard exchange have always had free accounts. Second, flashcard exchange have a once off membership payment: it is not a yearly payment. So I think it is unlikely that flashcard exchange would require any form of renewal for those that have bought Mental Case on the iPhone.
What certainly could happen at some point is that we bring out a new major release of the app, and then the conditions of access to Flashcard Exchange could change, but at this point we have no plans for this.
Drew
---------------------------
Drew McCormack
Mental Case Developer